Decision contract
A stable ALLOW, BLOCK, or ESCALATE response with release state, route, reason codes, trace identity, and proof references.
For AI implementation partners and SIs: embed Decision Authorization and proof packets into high-stakes workflow deployments.
Systems integrators and AI implementation partners own the customer environment, workflow, identity, endpoint integration, operational change, review ownership, and deployment topology. OntoGuard supplies Decision Authorization, semantic admissibility, evidence packaging, review-routing requirements, no-bind proof, and route-evidence design.
| Partner provides | OntoGuard provides |
|---|---|
| Customer environment | Authorization decision |
| Endpoint integration | Evidence and reason codes |
| Identity and access | Decision packet |
| Operational workflow | No-bind and route proof |
| Customer review roles | Reviewer-routing requirements |
| Production enforcement | Proof of the governed decision |
This division prevents a controlled product proof from being mistaken for customer-specific endpoint enforcement.
A stable ALLOW, BLOCK, or ESCALATE response with release state, route, reason codes, trace identity, and proof references.
BM25 and semantic retrieval can discover candidate evidence; ontology grounding and authority checks determine whether it is relevant to the proposed movement. Retrieval rank alone never authorizes release.
Buyer-readable and machine-readable artifacts preserve decision state, evidence posture, uncertainty, route maturity, and no-bind status.
The packet states which reviewer role, authority, evidence, and outcome closure are still required.
Control points, token checks, refused operations, replay records, fail-closed tests, and downstream closure are made explicit.
Approved and corrected outcomes may become review-gated candidates without live model-weight mutation in the authorization path.
Identify proposed movements, downstream systems, actors, consequence classes, and control points.
Map the Decision Authorization contract to identity, workflow, endpoint, and reviewer systems.
Run fail-closed, bypass-attempt, authorization-token, and replay tests on the selected corridor.
Define reviewer role, qualification, delegated authority, decision options, and outcome closure.
Inspect packet parity across PDF, JSON, receipt, manifest, trace, and route evidence.
Separate controlled proof from what the customer integration has actually established in production.
Partners can begin with a Demo Proof Pack or selected workflow assessment, then move to a Decision Authorization pilot, embedded proof layer, co-sell, OEM, or strategic licensing discussion. Production route completeness is claimed only after the customer route is integrated, tested, replayable, fail-closed, and outcome-accounted.
A successful corridor starts with a route inventory rather than a generic model integration. The partner identifies each proposed movement, actor, downstream system, identity boundary, consequence class, reviewer role, and commit point. OntoGuard maps that event to the Decision Authorization contract and the evidence that must accompany ALLOW, BLOCK, or ESCALATE. BM25 may retrieve exact policy or source candidates, while semantic governance connects the candidates to the current workflow and authority state. Retrieval remains evidence discovery, not a release decision.
The partner places the authorization call before the protected commit and ensures a missing, invalid, or withheld decision cannot be bypassed by the selected endpoint.
The customer’s identity system and operating policy establish who may review, override, approve, or close a case. OntoGuard records the resolved or pending state in the packet.
The integrated route should reproduce the governed event, preserve trace and receipt references, and account for the final operational outcome rather than stopping at queue assignment.
Route registration alone is insufficient. The selected path should be governed, tested, replayable, fail-closed, non-bypassable within the agreed boundary, and outcome-accounted. Evidence should show the attempted operation, authorization-token state, enforcement response, reviewer decision where applicable, downstream commit state, and protected-effect result. Claims remain limited to the routes and endpoints actually integrated and tested.